|
Class I Defence (FD&D)
Failure of owners to follow charterers' orders
An Assured time-charters a vessel for a period of about
5-7 months. On the last voyage the vessel loads a cargo of
steel at Constantza for carriage to various Chinese ports.
Towards the end of the voyage, owners send a message to
the Assured advising that a large amount of hire and
expenses are due and calling upon him to pay this
immediately. Before the Assured can respond, he is
notified by the Master that the vessel has anchored in
Hong Kong waters and will go no further until the alleged
outstandings are paid. The Assured requests the Club's
assistance under the terms of his Defence cover.
The Assured legitimately disputes the amount owners
claim as being due but remits a much smaller admitted sum
and calls upon the owners to continue the voyage. The
owners then purport to rely on their right to exercise a
lien over the cargo pursuant to clause 18 of the NYPE
charterparty to support their alleged right to halt the
vessel en route to the discharge port. The Club advises
that the owners' right to exercise a lien cannot be
lawfully exercised in the circumstances of the case en
route and, following the Club's advice, the Assured again
calls upon owners to continue with the voyage.
Unfortunately, shortly after this, a message is received
from the Master stating that he has been instructed by the
owners to proceed in the opposite direction to the
discharge port and that owners are planning to sell the
cargo. The Club advises the Assured that he may be able to
apply to the High Court in London, since the charterparty
is governed by English law, for an injunction restraining
the owners from continuing with their current course of
action. On the Club's recommendation, outside legal advice
is sought on the merits of such an application.
The Club, on behalf of the Assured, instructs
solicitors who confirm the advice given so far and
recommend the instruction of Counsel to make an
application to Court. An application is quickly made to
the High Court and an order is obtained restraining the
owners from ordering the vessel to any ports other than
those named in the bills of lading and from dealing with
the cargo other than by delivering it up to those persons
entitled to possession. This order is faxed and couriered
to the owners who quickly review their position and resume
the contractual voyage (which is completed without further
incident). The disputes relating to hire and other matters
are referred to arbitration in London in the usual way.
Under his Defence entry, the Assured has benefited from
free legal advice from the Club as his problems with the
owners have developed, and his legal costs incurred
thereafter in obtaining the injunction and pursuing the
owners in arbitration are covered by the Club.
|